(no subject)
22 June 2005 16:10![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![]() | You scored as Iceman. Iceman is a very powerful but volitile X-man. His ego and reluctance to follow orders means that he often clashes with Cyclops. Despite being immature sometimes, he's very popular with the ladies and is an extremely powerful X-Man. Powers: Can lower the temperature in areas around him. Basically, he has a near limitless ability to freeze things and make massive amounts of ice.
Most Comprehensive X-Men Personality Quiz created with QuizFarm.com |
no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 21:12 (UTC)I can see that.
I would be tempted to take it myself but not sure which would bother me more. Getting myself... Or Jean.
no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 21:16 (UTC)Yeah, but it's that 'ego and reluctance to follow orders' that gets me in trouble, makes me lose the trust of someone who truly matters to me.
no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 21:19 (UTC)Last night you were all happy. Want to talk about it, Darling? I can't help but be worried about you.
no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 21:21 (UTC)I AM happy, Gorgeous. But I fucked up, did something I should have and lost his trust. It's going to take some time to earn it back, but we're working on it.
no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 21:25 (UTC)And if I can help? Even if it means locking you both up in the villa until he trusts you again? So be it.
*grins impishly*
I shouldn't volunteer to make him forget, should I? I can you know.
no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 21:29 (UTC)It's going to take more than several days of bed breaking sex to fix this. Actions speak louder than words, and bed springs.
And no, no making him forget. I think that ranks a little higher on the 'Fuck Up Scale' than drugging him and heading off to my death.
no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 23:37 (UTC)*Shocked tones.*
I mean, I'm very glad but...
no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 23:42 (UTC)Drugged him, left to go take on the bitch by myself, got told by an ally of sorts that everything was taken care of and to go home.
He woke up before I got there.
no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 23:58 (UTC)So you two are all broken up? Well, were you ever together? I mean, I thought you were in love with that girl we talked about and...
You do know my brain is quite possibly too fried for this, right?
no subject
Date: 23 Jun 2005 00:21 (UTC)*smiles*
...need to to make a chart?
no subject
Date: 23 Jun 2005 00:28 (UTC)*rolls her eyes, smiling*
I was in love with a married man, after all. And now? I wish it wsa as simple as having one man I loved and one I was with.
no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 21:20 (UTC)no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 21:22 (UTC)no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 21:26 (UTC)Because it describes him as "uptight" and (like I tell everyone. Over and over.) I am not uptight.
no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 21:25 (UTC)A very good thing. Just, don't call a current lover by your former lover's name. That is the bad thing.
no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 21:28 (UTC)no subject
Date: 22 Jun 2005 23:23 (UTC)When touched by the person or any of the people it's addressed to (Jason and Nate), the mask fades and is replaced by this message: a gathering of twilight against a rising darkness.